http://pc.ign.com/articles/834/834614p1.html

Hmm only 9.4 Thats what Halo3 got wasnt it?

Orange Box is better LOL. I love how IGN says next to visuals if you've got two 8800s running in 1920x1200 your in for a real treat, YOU CAN'T RUN IT IN 1920x1200 WITH TWO 8800s and get GOOD FRAMES.

No way is this game an 80% game

The gameplay is more varied and open than any shooter I've ever played. The guns are amazing (I wuvlez modular!). The graphics are perfect. The audio is superb.

How did this get out-rated by the Orange Box ffs?!

because, those reviewers have CRAPPY PCs, the are console hoes, especially the 360.

Apparently on the hardest difficulty they speak Korean, not 100% sure though

Koreans speak English? Wtf IGN are a bunch of ****ing pansy *** butt munchers.

1UP gave it an 8 out of 10

http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId...21&sec=REVIEWS

Screw the ratings, the game is what matters, and imho, it delivers!

I believe they gave Halo 3 a 9.5.

CONFIRMED halo 3 is better then crysis.

lol just kidding.

Honestly I would expect this game to score higher then halo though. I mean it does so many things halo doesn't. Oh well.

Reviewers are much harder on PC games. You can't compare consoles games rating to a PC games rating. Halo 3 get a 9.5 it's like a 8.5 on PC...