Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blazur
The 100% width, the defining avatars and signatures, and easier to digest color scheme that's very pleasant on the eyes, and a reputation system that encourages responsibility and socializing.
|
Yeah, I know this thread is mostly about organization but it would be great to hear some feeback from the team about some of these issues. Particularly reputation - does the new software support such a thing? Getting that kind of feedback on posts is a lot of fun.
Now that the width issue has been fixed the SC:L forums are really pretty good. The only issue is that unlike BlizzForums there is not a super-clear demarcation between posts so you can instantly see who said what. It's all done with blank space and understated background images which is a little harder to read. Sorry to nitpick but I'm sure you guys don't mind constructive feedback right?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gradius
It belongs in SC2 because all lore now has to be compared to StarCraft 2 canon. If we ever get to the point where it gets cluttered with "how is Protoss babby formed" questions then we'll make a new forum. There's just not that much lore discussion going on.
|
Yeah, you're probably right. That's probably another reason it makes sense to merge SC/BW discussion and strategy together, unless conversation really kicks up over there.